Agreed

I love what some of my fellow classmates have come up with. I do agree that there is a difference between art in a vandalism sense and art in a visually pleasing sense. On my comment earlier in the year I previously mentioned that I believed that anything created from God or man is art and I still hold true to this statement. However, some of my classmates have brought to my attention that this graffitti is determined by its main purpose. I agree. Was this graffitti meant to just be a senseless word scribbled on the side of a building or was it put there to be aesthetically pleasing to the viewer? I guess like I mentioned earlier, only "the eye of the beholder" can dictate whether or not this is a piece of art. I really don't have anything else to say except that I loved what everyone else published. It showed me different perspectives I was previously blind to.